Dan Terzian is a commercial litigator. His practice spans the full range of claims faced and brought by businesses—breach of contract, computer fraud, defamation, false claims, RICO, trade secret misappropriation, and unfair competition.
Dan's victories include winning an unprecedented motion to dismiss computer fraud claims and a $60 million summary judgment motion in an insurance coverage case. He also opposed a motion to compel discovery of certain documents and won—even though the leading treatise said (wrongly, in Dan’s opinion) that the law was against him.
Several years ago, Dan read an article describing a top flight criminal defense lawyer as both a fighter and a scholar. Ever since he’s aspired to nothing less. In that vein, Dan literally wrote the hornbook on the Fifth Amendment and encryption. He has also written on the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. His publications span the Los Angeles Times, American Banker, and the Northwestern University Law Review, among others. His work has been cited or quoted by the Fourth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, the Court of Appeals of Indiana, the Congressional Research Service, The Guardian, American Banker, MIT Technology Review, Ars Technica, U.S. News & World Report, The Verge, and advocacy groups such as the Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.
IN THE NEWS
Dan Terzian for The Recorder | February 14, 2018 — Law, New York — When people switch jobs, both sets of employers face known risks. The former employers risk their…
Dan Terzian for The Georgetown Law Journal | 2016 — The Georgetown Law Journal — Opinions on encryption clearly diverge. But this micro-hornbook isn’t about opinions. It’s about the law……
Dan Terzian for California Law Review | May, 2015 — California Law Review — The argument runs like this. The Fifth Amendment generally bars forced incrimination… Click to read the…
Successfully defended charter jet company against claims of violating the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, convincing the court to dismiss the claims with prejudice.
Successfully defended an individual against claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, convincing the court to dismiss the claims.
Successfully defended a financial institution in a government investigation, convincing the government entity to drop the investigation.
Successfully defended a leading international insurer in an insurance coverage case, extinguishing $60 million of potential liability on summary judgment.
Successfully defended an aerospace manufacturer in a commercial dispute with one of its clients, achieving a favorable settlement at the outset of litigation.
University of California, Los Angeles, School of Law
Managing Editor, UCLA Law Review
California Polytechnic State University
State Bar of California
United States District Court, Northern District of California
United States District Court, Central District of California
United States District Court, Southern District of California
United States District Court, Eastern District of California
United States Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court
Duane Morris LLP
United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands